My definition of a true leadership - A chieftain and A book

People who are interested in Philosophy but not a Philosophy major doesn't like the overly complicated style of writing where everything is symbolic or metaphorical and have to dig for the meaning instead of it just being clearly stated. For example, reading Newton's principia feels struggling for really understanding the work not because the ideas in it are too complicated, but because reaching the ideas feels like going through a maze of unnecessary jargon to reach them, and by the time one has made it through all that, people become too mentally drained to even digest what they're really saying. Is there anything wrong?

Architect is a tricky spot between technical and managerial careers. While technologists sees this position as the top of tech gurus, it is in fact a particular type of management role where neither normal manager nor top technical personnel fit, because both top technical skills and executive skills are assumed

Machine Learning is to me is the transcendentalization of my combined passion toward Software Engineering and Data Analytics. While Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a broad field encompassing the creation of machines that can perform tasks that typically require human intelligence, Machine Learning (ML) is a specific subset of AI focused on enabling machines to learn from data. Given that distinction, this posts is NOT about AI, but Machine Learning in general.

Simon Sinek has a simple but powerful model for inspirational leadership -- starting with a golden circle and the question: "Why?" His examples include Apple, Martin Luther King Jr. and the Wright Brothers ...

Just what are the factors that cause one person to say yes to another person? Which techniques by others most effectively use these factors to bring about such compliance? Why it is that a request stated in a certain way will be rejected, while a request that asks for the same favor in a slightly different fashion will be successful?